Federal rule on Title IX is a ruse to require trans sports participation, GOP states say (2024)

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Biden administration has put on hold a plan to prohibit across-the-board bans on transgender athletes on school teams during an election year in which Republicans are rallying around restrictions on trans youths. But GOP state leaders are making sure voters know the issue is still on the table.

At least two dozen Republican-controlled states have sued over a different federal regulation being implemented to protect the rights of transgender students that they argue would require governments to allow transgender girls to play on girls teams.

The rule they are challenging doesn’t specifically mention transgender athletes. It spells out that Title IX, the landmark 1972 law originally passed to address women’s rights at schools and colleges receiving federal money, also bars discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

Republicans now are trying to keep the focus on sports, appealing to parents’ and athletes’ sensitivities over fairness in competition. They have student athletes signing on as plaintiffs and appearing alongside attorneys general at news conferences announcing the lawsuits.

The states argue the new rule would open the door to forcing schools to allow transgender athletes to compete on teams aligning with their gender identity, even if the rule doesn’t say so specifically. They may have a point.

The new regulation “gives a pretty good sense that says, ‘You can’t have a rule that says if you’re transgender, you can’t participate,’” said Harper Seldin, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, which has represented trans athletes in unrelated cases.

He said that while he hopes separate sports-related regulations will back that up, that’s not yet clear.

Advocates for transgender athletes say the GOP officials’ claims are more rooted in politics than reality and are aimed more at undercutting litigation against state restrictions on transgender athletes.

“It is puzzling that these folks are talking about challenging a rule that does not do what they say is the thing they’re objecting to,” said Cathryn Oakley, senior director of legal policy for the Human Rights Campaign, a leading LGBTQ+ advocacy group. “It’s pretty hard to see how they can expect to be taken seriously when they don’t see to know what the content of the rule they’re challenging is.”

And many transgender youths and their families say restrictions unfairly paint trans athletes as a risk. Erik Cole-Johnson, a New Hampshire father who spoke against a proposed ban, said being able to compete in cross-country running and Nordic skiing has allowed his daughter to flourish.

“My daughter’s not a boogeyman; my daughter’s not a threat,” Cole-Johnson told a state Senate panel in April as it heard the bill, now on Republican Gov. Chris Sununu’s desk. “Transgender girls are not a threat.”

New Hampshire is not among the states challenging the rule. The GOP challenges have been filed in several federal circuit courts in hopes that one will halt the new rule before it takes effect in August. Several states, including Arkansas and Oklahoma, have also said they don’t plan to comply.

The White House originally planned to include a new policy forbidding schools from enacting outright bans on transgender athletes, but that was put on hold in what was widely seen as a political move to avert controversy before the fall election. The Education Department said it has received more than 150,000 public comments on the athletics policy but didn’t give a timeline for release of the rule.

A lawsuit filed by Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach said the lack of guidance on athletics in the rule that instead is taking effect is a “red herring,” given the department’s default position that Title IX doesn’t allow discrimination based on sex.

Many states challenging the rule have also enacted laws placing restrictions on transgender athletes, as well as on the restrooms and changing rooms they can use or pronouns they can be addressed by at school, policies that could also be voided by the regulations.

“I don’t want any girl to lose her right to a fair playing field or her right to use a safe place to change,” said Amelia Ford, a high school basketball player from Brookland, Arkansas, who is a plaintiff in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Missouri challenging the enacted rule.

In the discussion over trans people competing in sports in line with their gender identity, each side points to limited research that backs their viewpoints about whether trans women and girls have an edge over cisgender women and girls.

By some accounts, given the relatively small population of transgender people — a bit over 1% of all people ages 13-24 nationwide, according to estimates by UCLA Law’s Williams Institute — and the even lower number of those who compete, disputes over fairness in school sports don’t appear to be widespread. Many lawmakers who have pushed for athletic bans haven’t cited examples in their own states, instead pointing to a handful of high-profile cases elsewhere, such as swimmer Lia Thomas.

When Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed an executive order refusing to comply with the latest Title IX regulations, she was joined by former Kentucky swimmer Riley Gaines, who was among more than a dozen college athletes who sued the NCAA for allowing Thomas to compete at the national championships in 2022.

The lawsuits also come as GOP states try to get the U.S. Supreme Court to weigh in on their restrictions on transgender athletes. West Virginia is appealing a ruling that allowed a transgender athlete to compete on her middle school teams. The ruling last month from the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that the ban violated the student’s rights under Title IX.

“Many of these cases are premature and certainly just trying to undercut the basic notion that trans students are protected under Title IX and attempting to continue the exclusions that we have seen in states across the country with respect to athletics,” said Paul Castillo, an attorney with Lambda Legal.


This story has been updated to correct the percentage of transgender people ages 13-24 to a bit over 1%, instead of 2.74%.


Associated Press writers Geoff Mulvihill in New Jersey and Seung Min Kim in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report.

Federal rule on Title IX is a ruse to require trans sports participation, GOP states say (2024)


What are the Title IX rules for sports? ›

The Title IX regulations require schools to provide equal opportunity based on sex. This requirement applies to schools' athletic programs, including club, intramural, and intercollegiate teams.

How did Title IX affect female participation in sport? ›

Title IX gives women athletes the right to equal opportunity in sports in educational institutions that receive federal funds, from elementary schools to colleges and universities.

Is Title IX unfair to men's sports? ›

The federal courts have found that rather than requiring schools to cut men's teams, Title IX allows schools to choose how to structure their athletic programs and as long as men and women are treated equally, colleges can fund whatever programs they choose (Title IX and Men's Sports: A False Conflict).

What are the equal opportunity requirements of Title IX? ›

The preamble to Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 states that: “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”

Is football exempt from Title IX? ›

Under Title IX there are no sport exclusions or exceptions. Individual participation opportunities (number of student-athletes participating rather than number of sports) in all men's and women's sports are counted in determining whether an institution meets Title IX participation standards.

What are the issues with Title IX? ›

Unfortunately, Title IX coordinators often lack the support, guidance and training needed to complete their work. Some of the most egregious Title IX violations occur when schools fail to designate a Title IX coordinator or when the Title IX coordinator does not have the training or authority to oversee compliance.

Who started Title IX? ›

Title IX of the Civil Rights Act was signed into law on June 23, 1972 by President Richard M. Nixon. However, Title IX began its journey through all three branches of government when Representative Patsy T. Mink, of Hawaii, who is recognized as the major author and sponsor of the legislation, introduced it in Congress.

What positive effect did Title IX have on women's? ›

The law opened doors and removed barriers for girls and women, and while female athletes and their sports programs still have fewer teams, fewer scholarships, and lower budgets than their male counterparts, since Title IX's passage, female participation at the high school level has grown by 1057 percent and by 614 ...

What were sports like before Title IX? ›

It required American society to recognize a woman's right to participate in sports on a plane equal to that of men. Prior to 1870, activities for women were recreational rather than sport-specific in nature. They were noncompetitive, informal, rule-less; they emphasized physical activity rather than competition.

Why is Title IX not fair? ›

Title IX presented a complicated numbers game to athletic departments: Their student-athletes had to reflect the same gender disparity as that of the school plastered on their uniforms. So if a college campus was 56 percent women, then roughly 56 percent of the student-athletes should also be women.

Does Title IX protect against relationship violence? ›

It also requires gender equality in all areas of education, and although Title IX is often cited for its protections around sexual assault, it also protects survivors of sexual harassment, dating abuse, and intimate partner violence (IPV).

Which NCAA division does not allow athletic scholarships? ›

The College Division split again in 1973 when the NCAA went to its current naming convention: Division I, Division II, and Division III. D-III schools are not allowed to offer athletic scholarships, while D-II schools can.

What is an example of a Title IX violation? ›

Sexual abuse or assault, battery, or coercion. Unwanted sexual contact that stops short of rape or completed rape. Use of force or manipulation of unwanted sexual activity. Physical acts where a person is incapable of giving consent or is against a person's will.

What did Final Rule add to Title IX? ›

The Final Rule allows a school, in its discretion, to choose to offer and facilitate informal resolution options, such as mediation or restorative justice as long as both parties given voluntary, informed, written consent to attempt informal resolution.

What is the Title IX amendment 2024? ›

The final regulations promote accountability and fulfill Title IX's nondiscrimination mandate by requiring schools to act promptly and effectively in response to information about conduct that reasonably may constitute sex discrimination, including sexual violence and other forms of sex- based harassment.

What are the three components of Title IX? ›

There are three parts to Title IX as it applies to athletics programs: (1) effective accommodation of student interests and abilities (participation), (2) athletic financial assistance (scholarships), and (3) other program components (the “laundry list” of benefits to and treatment of athletes).

What are the violations of the NCAA Title IX? ›

Common NCAA Title IX violations include:

Sexual harassment by a coach or another student. Inequitable recruitment of student-athletes. Disproportionate funding or scholarship opportunities based on sex. Male and female student-athletes not receiving equal treatment when it comes to equipment or coaching.

What is IX in sports? ›

Title IX prohibits schools from excluding individuals from participation in interscholastic, intercollegiate, club or intramural athletics solely on the basis of their sex, but permits schools to provide separate male and female athletic teams when sex-based selection criteria is based on competitive skill or if the ...

What are the three parts included in the Amendment for Equal women's sports? ›

Several years later, the Department of Education released an interpretation of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics and provided that there are three separate areas evaluated for compliance: (1) participation opportunities, (2) athletic scholarships, and (3) benefit and treatment areas.


Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Aracelis Kilback

Last Updated:

Views: 5273

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (64 voted)

Reviews: 87% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Aracelis Kilback

Birthday: 1994-11-22

Address: Apt. 895 30151 Green Plain, Lake Mariela, RI 98141

Phone: +5992291857476

Job: Legal Officer

Hobby: LARPing, role-playing games, Slacklining, Reading, Inline skating, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, Dance

Introduction: My name is Aracelis Kilback, I am a nice, gentle, agreeable, joyous, attractive, combative, gifted person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.